Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5819
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahadzir M.Men_US
dc.contributor.authorSyaham M.Men_US
dc.contributor.authorFohimi N.A.Men_US
dc.contributor.authorRabilah Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorIqbal A.M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T04:54:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T04:54:36Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.issn2289-4934-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5819-
dc.descriptionMyciteen_US
dc.description.abstractNowadays, methods to increase efficiency in producer gas have become major issues in biomass gasification research. Producer gas is a renewable energy source that does not take as much time to obtain as fossil fuels. It is typically a mixture of combustible gases like carbon monoxide, hydrogen and methane, and non-combustible gases like carbon dioxide and nitrogen. A high percentage volume of combustible composition in the producer gas output will have a high calorific value or heat of combustion. These combustible gases are determined by the design of the gasifier. In today's era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0, the use of simulation is highly prioritised in all aspects of engineering, especially in gasification applications. Simulation is a useful tool for learning about the governing principles and optimal operating points of the gasification process. Artificial intelligence (AI), is a major focus of Industry Revolution 4.0. In this project, the producer gas composition prediction is studied by computer simulation. The goals are to predict the output producer gas using an algorithm and to compare the trained prediction result with actual experiment data for rice husk gasification. This simulation was created with MATLAB software's artificial neural network (ANN). Three parameters (the height of the gasifier, the diameter of the gasifier, and the weight of the rice husk) are set as input data, and six types of the composition of producer gas (carbon dioxide,carbon monoxide, methane, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen) are set as output data. The algorithm is trained, tested, and verified with the experiment data. It is then used to predict the output gas composition from the parameters of a gasification experiment that has been used before in UiTM’s laboratory. The simulation results of producer gas composition between prediction and actual values revealed a relative error of 1.159 %, 0.370 %, and 0.330 %. These results were less than 9% and were found to give a very good fit to the neural network algorithm.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherESTEEM Academic Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofESTEEM Academic Journalen_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networken_US
dc.subjectalgorithmen_US
dc.subjectproducer gasen_US
dc.subjectbiomass gasifieren_US
dc.subjectrice husken_US
dc.titleProducer Gas Composition Prediction using Artificial Neural Network Algorithmen_US
dc.typeNationalen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24191/esteem.v19iMarch.210-
dc.description.page68-78en_US
dc.volume19en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeNational-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
Appears in Collections:Journal Indexed MyCite - FBKT
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
5. 2023MarchProducerGasCompositionPredictionusing....ESTEEMAcademicJournal.pdf942.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.