Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5261
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBasnayake, BMYIen_US
dc.contributor.authorNisansala, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWijewickrama, PIJBen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerathunga, USen_US
dc.contributor.authorGunasekara, KWMYDen_US
dc.contributor.authorPushpakumara, DBNen_US
dc.contributor.authorJayasekera, NKen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalupahana, AWen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalupahana, RSen_US
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Fletcher, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKottawatta, KSAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-27T04:26:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-27T04:26:11Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1201-9712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5261-
dc.descriptionWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Intro Combating AMR is a major challenge in current era. This study aims to investigate the distribution of AMR and the Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) among livestock, wild animals and environment in an ecosystem with a high density of organized livestock farms in Sri Lanka. Methods: One square km area at Kosgama was mapped using GPS as the study area. In total 222 samples: feces from livestock and wild animals, soil and water from environment, were collected and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were isolated. Maximum of two E. coli per sample were tested to profile AMR for 12 antimicrobials. Among the E. coli, ESBL producers were screened and ESBL expressions were phenotypically detected using cefpodoxime combination disk kit. Prevalence of common ESBL genes: blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV was detected by PCR. Findings: Seventy seven percent (61/79) of livestock, 62% (42/68) of wild animals, 79% (35/44) of soil and 68% (21/31) of water samples were positive for E. coli. Of the E. coli tested for AMR in livestock, the highest resistance (51.7%) was detected against tetracycline followed by ampicillin (39.4%) and nalidixic acid (37.7%). E. coli from wildlife (45%) and soil/ water (46.5%) reflected the highest resistance against streptomycin. Of the E. coli isolates, 31.5% (36/114) of livestock, 7.3% (6/82) of wildlife, 12.1% (8/66) of soil and 31.4% (11/35) of water were Multi Drug Resistant (MDR). Among 37 E. coli screened as ESBL, two from a mongoose (Herpestes edwardsii) were phenotypically positive for ESBL. Prevalence of ESBL genes were ∼49% (18/37) of which 17 carried blaTEM gene and one that expressed ESBL phenotypically contained blaCTX-M gene. Gene bla SHV was not detected. Conclusion: Unexpected presence of AMR, MDR and ESBL E. coli particularly in wild animals and environment throw light on necessity of prudent use of antimicrobials.en_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Society for Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectCombating AMRen_US
dc.titleExtent of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in an Ecosystem with Organized Livestock Farming in Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeInternationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.032-
dc.description.pageS12en_US
dc.volume130en_US
dc.description.typeMeeting Abstracten_US
dc.description.impactfactor8.4en_US
dc.description.quartileQ1en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeInternational-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Journal (Scopus/WOS)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.