Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3233
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDada, James Temitopeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdeiza, Adamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, N. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArnaut, Marinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T08:39:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-10T08:39:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn14777835-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3233-
dc.descriptionWeb of Science / Scopusen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Motivated by the conflicting evidence on the effect of financial development on environmental quality, this study investigates the moderating role of institutional quality in the link between financial development and environmental quality using a robust proxy in Malaysia from 1984 to 2017. Design/methodology/approach: Ecological footprint is used to measure environmental quality, while financial development is proxied using three measures (domestic credit provided by the private sector, domestic credit provided by the financial sector and domestic credit provided by the banking sector). An index of institutional quality is generated from voice and accountability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption. Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bounds Test, Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square and Canonical Cointegrating Regression were used as the estimation techniques. Findings: The results show that financial development, institutional quality, economic growth and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality in the short run, whereas trade openness and natural resources worsen it. In the long run, financial development, institutional quality, economic growth, trade openness and natural resources deteriorate the environment. Furthermore, findings from the interactive term suggest that institutions and financial development complement each other to affect the environment in the short run. However, institutions and financial development perform a substitutability role in influencing the environment in the long run. Practical implications: The outcome of this study suggests that there are time lags in the relationship between institutional quality, financial development and ecological footprint in Malaysia. Furthermore, the study offers important policy implications to policymakers in Malaysia and other developing countries on how to mitigate environmental degradation. Originality/value: This study contributes to the body of knowledge on the moderating role of institutional quality in the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint in Malaysia. It examines the direct and indirect effects of financial development on environmental degradation through institutional quality, which have received less attention in the context of Malaysia. The findings from this study are robust to different proxies and estimation techniques.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofManagement of Environmental Quality: An International Journalen_US
dc.subjectEcological footprinten_US
dc.subjectFinancial developmenten_US
dc.subjectInstitutional qualityen_US
dc.subjectMalaysiaen_US
dc.titleFinancial development-ecological footprint nexus in Malaysia: the role of institutionsen_US
dc.typeNationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/MEQ-10-2021-0251-
dc.description.page913 - 937en_US
dc.volume33 (4)en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.correspondingauthoradams.a@umk.edu.myen_US
item.openairetypeNational-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
Appears in Collections:Malaysia Graduate School of Entrepreneurship and Business - Journal (Scopus/WOS)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.