Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2758
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmaal Fadhlini Mohameden_US
dc.contributor.authorRadzuwan Ab Rashiden_US
dc.contributor.authorNor Hazwani Munirah Latehen_US
dc.contributor.authorYohan Kurniawanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17T09:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-17T09:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.issn2637-0360-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2758-
dc.descriptionMyciteen_US
dc.description.abstractMetadiscourseis used by a writer to organise his text and textually interact with the potential readers. An effective use of metadiscourse reflects the writer’s writing ability because itis one of the aspects in composing process of making a successful text. However,ESL writers especially undergraduates tend to face problems in using metadiscourse markers in their writing. Many of them do not use the metadiscourse markers appropriately in their essay writing.This preliminary studyinvestigates the use of metadiscourse markers in good persuasive essays written by undergraduates from a public university in Malaysia. The corpus examined in the study was built from 195 persuasive essays written by the secondyear studentsat the university. The objective of this preliminary paper is to present the metadiscourse markers found in a corpus of good undergraduate writers’ essays. The markers are classified in the main categories (organisational and interpersonal discourse markers) and sub-categories based on Tan et al.’s (2012) simplified metadiscourse framework for ESL lay writers. Using a computer-mediated concordance software, this study aims to reveal the frequency of the metadiscourse markers use in a total of 195 good persuasive essays produced by Malaysian undergraduate writers. The findings presented in this paper are anticipated to be beneficial for other researchers who are interested in finding an example of metadiscourse markers usage in good persuasive essays.Keywords: good persuasive essays; metadiscourse; undergraduate writing; organisational discourse markers; interpersonal discourse markers.INTRODUCTIONMalaysian undergraduate students engage in many types of essay writing including argumentative, persuasive, comparative reflective and writing. They are essentially required to produce these types of essay writing in classrooms especially in English classes. This exercise is a preparation for the students to write a good English language writing in the workplacelateren_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherINSANIAH: Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanitiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINSANIAH: Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectgood persuasive essaysen_US
dc.subjectmetadiscourseen_US
dc.subjectorganisational discourse markersen_US
dc.subjectundergraduate writingen_US
dc.subjectinterpersonal discourse markersen_US
dc.titleThe Use of Metadiscourse in Good Malaysian Undergraduate Persuasive Essaysen_US
dc.typeNationalen_US
dc.description.page1-12en_US
dc.volumespecial issue November 2021en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeNational-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Language Studies and Human Development - Other publication
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
INSANIAH.pdf187.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.