Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1830
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeo L.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLing G.H.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTan M.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeng P.C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-05T09:00:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-05T09:00:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.issn20711050-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1830-
dc.descriptionWeb of Science / Scopusen_US
dc.description.abstractA few studies on outdoor human thermal comfort (HTC) have been conducted in the tropical region in a hot and humid climate; however, there is a paucity of discussions on how exactly different spatial settings influence HTC. Thus, this paper aims to examine how land use land cover (LULC) affects HTC on the basis of the simulation of Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET) indices via ENVI-met and Rayman. The results reveal that people living in the urban area have a higher tendency to experience strong heat stress (25% of the areas with PMV ranging from 3.4 to 3.9 and 2% of the areas, where PMV reached 4.1), followed by the rural area (43% of the areas with PMV ranging from 2.1 to 2.4), and the suburban area (more than 50% of the areas with PMV values less than 2.4). Surprisingly, a concrete LULC in the suburb area exhibits a higher air temperature than an asphalt surface at 4 p.m., due to the large area of high albedo that increases the reflection of solar radiation, subsequently contributing to warming up the airmass. Similarly, sandy, and loamy LULC tend to emit more heat during nighttime, while the heat is absorbed slowly during daytime, and it is then slowly released during nighttime after 6 p.m. Spatial settings that promote heat stress in the urban area are mainly contributed by an LULC of asphalt, concrete, sandy, and loamy areas. Meanwhile, people in the suburban and rural areas are less likely to experience heat stress, due to agricultural plantations and lowland forest that provide shade, except for the barren lands-loamy areas. The result also indicates that tree-covered areas near the river in the suburban area afforded the best thermal experience with PMV of 2.1 and PET of 30.7. From the LULC comparison, it is pivotal to consider tree species (canopy density), surface material (albedo), sky-view factor, wind direction, and speed toward designing a more comfortable and sustainable environment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Higher Education Malaysiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectoutdoor thermal comforten_US
dc.subjectENVI-meten_US
dc.subjectLULCen_US
dc.subjectmicroclimate simulationen_US
dc.titleInterrelationships between Land Use Land Cover (LULC) and human thermal comfort (HTC): A comparative analysis of different spatial settingsen_US
dc.typeInternationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13010382-
dc.description.fundingThis research was funded by Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamen tal Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) grant number 203.PHUMANITI.6711695 and the NEWTON-NERC (IMPRESS-Malaysia), grant number 203.PHUMANITI.6780001.en_US
dc.description.page382en_US
dc.volume13(1)en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.impactfactor3.251en_US
dc.description.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.correspondingauthorTan, MLen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeInternational-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Architecture and Ekistics - Journal (Scopus/WOS)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
sustainability-13-00382-v2.pdf7.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.