Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1431
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZainuddin, S. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNik Hashim, Nik Alif Amrien_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdullah, Tahirahen_US
dc.contributor.authorSathiswaran Uthamaputranen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoorul Azwin Md Nasiren_US
dc.contributor.authorNadzirah Mohd Saiden_US
dc.contributor.authorMohamad Anuar, N.I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T01:55:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-03T01:55:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1431-
dc.descriptionOthersen_US
dc.description.abstractRisk management is not a new organisational discipline, however most of previous literatures in the field were almost monopolize by a single approach, those of positivism. Such a tendency towards a single approach can prove problematic as it can hinder the alternative conception of problems in the field of risk management. Moreover, this approach see risk management as a technical value free discipline which identical to the practice of natural science instead of its true nature as a social science that can be prove by observing the inrrelationship of the field with other elements in organisation, particularly the behaviour of organisation’s actors. This paper aims to review existing risk management research approach and its underlying assumptions that might be has evolve towards multiple approaches. The review found the conventional approach is still dominant in the field, however there are significantly increase in the recent literatures on the post-positivistic approach such interpretative and radical approach in studying risk management in organisation. The alternative approach is used to study the interpretation and risk management meaning through the practices in the organisation, the impact of the practice and its mutual interrelationship with the other organisational elements. In a review and analysis of this topic, this paper notes the importance of Burrell and Morgan’s rather surprising paradigm in the conceptual discussion of the discipline philosophy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalArch Foundationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPalarch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptologyen_US
dc.subjectRisk Managementen_US
dc.subjectPositivismen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophicalen_US
dc.subjectOrganisation Behaviouren_US
dc.titleRisk Management: A Review Of Recent Philosophical Perspectivesen_US
dc.typeNationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi1567-214X-
dc.description.page1931-1944en_US
dc.description.researchareaAccountingen_US
dc.volume17en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeNational-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
crisitem.author.deptUniversity Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
crisitem.author.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-8434-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Business - Other Publication
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Risk Management A Review Of Recent Philosophical Perspectives 2020.pdfZainuddin et al (2020)177.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.